Scope
Completing the “Issue Management” process with the effective communication about the state of the current item, whenever the issue could have an impact on the existing plans and/or processes (e.g. Quality, learned lesson). For the other processes (e.g. Risk and Chance Management) this document can be spared, namely the stakeholders will be kept in the loop using the procedured set for the specific domain.
The effectiveness can be measured with these parameters:
- Timeliness (no later than the same day of the Issue Management meeting). Earlier communications about the status are made either through the “Issue Management Register” and/or via e-mail.
- Clarity. Beside the indication of the actual status, a brief explanation has to be integrated with specific references (verifying that those documents were updated and accessible to the reader)
RACI (who does what)
| Operation desc./Roles[1] | Spr | PM | BA | SME | TL | Prd | Stkhd |
| Assessment of the Impact analysis | I | A | C | C | R | C | C |
| Acting within the existing plan | C | A | C | C | R | I | I |
| Compiling the Report | C | A | R | I | I | I | C |
Document structure
Distribution list
This kind of information can be considered sensitive. Therefore, it depends upon the implemented “profiling policy” (see post). However, it is suggested to inform all the interested stakeholders as described in the “Communication Management Strategy”.
Registrar section
These are the key fields
| Issue report ID | |
| Issue ID | |
| Impact Analysis ID | |
| Issue Type. | RFC/OS/PC (see post) |
| Date | Of the report |
| Date of last update. | Making references to document history |
| Author | |
| Description | As stated / updated by the author |
| Priority | (see post about Triage ). |
| Severity | As per Impact Analysis report |
| Status |
|
| Recommendation | What it has been suggested for solving the problem or at least reducing the impact. |
| Decision | Brief and clear explanation of what has been decided. Whether the decision is just about to escalate, all references shall be complete and updated |
| Approved by |
Technical domains
- Integrated Master Plan / Schedule
- Stage / Work-package plan
- Product Description
- Quality management strategy
- Risk management strategy
Financial / Commercial domains
- Business Case (time to market)
- Cash flow
- Suppliers’ contracts
References
Notes
[1] Spr Sponsor, PM Project manager, BA Business Analyst, TL Technical Leader, Prd Producer, Stkhd Stakeholder

